STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
In re:
NANCY J. SANDS )
)
Case No. 97-2865EC
Respondent. )
________________________________)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to notice, a formal hearing was held
in this case on January 30, 1998, at Palatka, Florida, before Susan B.
Kirkland, a duly designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of
Administrative Hearings.
APPEARANCES
Advocate: Eric S. Scott, Esquire
Florida Commission on Ethics
Office of the Attorney General
The Capitol, Plaza Level 01
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050
For Respondent: James L. Padgett, Esquire
Padgett and Morris
10 Central Avenue
Crescent City, Florida 32112
STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE
Whether Respondent violated Section
112.313(6), Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty should be recommended.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
On November 30, 1995, the Florida Commission
on Ethics entered an Order Finding Probable Cause to believe that Respondent,
Nancy J. Sands (Sands), former Welaka Town Clerk, violated Section 112.313(6),
Florida Statutes, by allowing individuals to make purchases through the Town of
Welaka's accounts, thus, avoiding the payment of sales tax. The case was forwarded to the Division of
Administrative Hearings for assignment to an administrative law judge. The case was originally assigned to
Administrative Law Judge, Carolyn S. Holifield, but was transferred to
Administrative Law Judge, Susan B.
Kirkland, to conduct the final hearing.
At the final hearing, the parties' Joint
Exhibits A and B were entered in evidence.
The Advocate called Grace Evans as his witness, and the Respondent
testified in her own behalf.
The parties agreed to file proposed
recommended orders on or before February 9, 1998. The Advocate filed his proposed recommended order on February 9,
1998. The Respondent did not file a
proposed recommended order.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Respondent, Nancy J. Sands (Sands), served as the Welaka Town Clerk from
May 28, 1993, until December 8, 1994.
2.
Welaka is a small town covering approximately one and one quarter square
miles. The population is 560. While Sands was town clerk, it was not
uncommon for local businesses to buy paper from the town if they ran out and
needed paper immediately. Nor was it
uncommon for employees of the town to make photocopies of documents for Welaka
residents free of charge. The town
council later voted to start charging residents for photocopies.
3.
Sands is friends with Grace Evans, a resident of Welaka, Florida.
4. In
September, 1994, Ms. Evans was at the Welaka Town Hall and saw Sands using a vacuum
cleaner. Ms. Evans liked the vacuum
cleaner and asked Sands where she had gotten it. Sands showed Ms. Evans a catalog from which Sands had ordered the
vacuum cleaner for the town. Ms. Evans
asked Sands if she could order her one.
5.
Sands agreed to place an order for Ms. Evans. There was no discussion concerning sales tax. Nor was there any thought given by either
Ms. Evans or Sands concerning the payment of sales tax on the purchase of the
vacuum cleaner. Based on the evidence,
it is clear that neither Ms. Evans nor Sands intended to purchase the vacuum
cleaner using the town's account number in order to avoid the payment of sales
tax.
6. On
September 27, 1994, Sands ordered a vacuum cleaner and some accessories from
the Wholesale Supply Company in Nashville, Tennessee, using the Town of
Welaka's account number. The order was
placed during Sands' working hours as the town clerk.
7.
Sands advised the Wholesale Supply Company that Grace Evans was the
customer for whom the vacuum was being purchased because the invoice which the
Wholesale Supply Company sent to the Town of Welaka stated that the customer
was Grace Evans.
8.
The total price of the merchandise Sands ordered for Ms. Evans was $109.70 plus shipping and
handling charges of $5.59.
9.
When Sands received the invoice, she wrote "Do not pay already
mailed in" on the front of the invoice, indicating that the invoice was
not to be paid by the town.
10.
The items were purchased at full price and Ms. Evans paid for the items.
11.
Ms. Evans did not pay any Florida sales tax on her vacuum cleaner
purchase.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
12.
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the
subject matter of and the parties to this proceeding. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
13.
The Commission on Ethics (Commission) has alleged that Respondent has
violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes.
The Commission, through the Advocate, must establish the elements of the
alleged violation by clear and convincing evidence. Latham v Commission on Ethics, 694 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA
1997).
14.
Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes (1993), provides:
MISUSE OF PUBLIC
POSITION. No public officer or employee
of an agency shall corruptly use or attempt to use his official position or any
property or resource which may be within his trust, or perform his official
duties, to secure a special privilege, benefit, or exemption for himself or
others. This section shall not be construed to conflict with s. 104.31.
15.
The term "corruptly" is defined by Section 112.312(9), Florida
Statutes, to mean:
[D]one with a
wrongful intent and for the purpose of obtaining, or compensating or receiving
compensation for, any benefit resulting from some act or omission of a public
servant which is inconsistent with the proper performance of his public duties.
16.
In order for it to be concluded that Sands violated Section 112.313(6),
Florida Statutes, the Advocate must establish the following elements:
1. The Respondent must have been a public
officer or employee.
2. The Respondent must have:
a.
used or attempted to use her official position or any property within
her trust or
b. performed her official
duties.
3. The Respondent's actions must have been
taken to secure a special privilege, benefit, or exemption for herself or
others.
4. The Respondent must have acted corruptly,
that is, with wrongful intent and for the purpose of benefiting herself or
another person from some act or omission which was inconsistent with the proper
performance of her public duties.
17.
The parties have agreed that as the Welaka Town Clerk Sands was subject
to the requirements of Part III, Chapter 112, Florida Statutes, the Code of
Ethics for Public Officers and Employees.
18.
The evidence did establish that Sands used her position as town clerk to
place an order for Ms. Evans for a vacuum cleaner. The evidence does not establish that Sands acted corruptly. There was no intent by Sands to avoid the
payment of sales tax. The subject of
sales tax did not enter her mind during the transaction.
19.
The Advocate has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence
that Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that a Final Order be entered finding
that Respondent, Nancy Sands, did not violate Section 112.313(6), Florida
Statutes, and dismissing the Complaint against her.
DONE AND ENTERED this 18th day of February,
1998, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
___________________________________
SUSAN B. KIRKLAND
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675
SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
Filed with the Clerk of the
Division of Administrative Hearings
this 18th day of February, 1998.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Bonnie Williams
Executive Director
Commission on Ethics
Post Office Drawer 15709
Tallahassee, Florida 32317-5709
Phil Claypool
General Counsel
Commission on Ethics
Post office Drawer 15709
Tallahassee, Florida 32317-5709
Kerrie J. Stillman
Complaint Coordinator
Commission on Ethics
Post Office Drawer 15709
Tallahassee, Florida 32317-5709
James L. Padgett, Esquire
Padgett and Morris
10 Central Avenue
Crescent City, Florida 32112
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO
SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written
exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order
should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.