STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

 

 

DAVID KAMINSKY,                   )

                                  )

Petitioner,                       )

                                  )

vs.                               )                               Case No. 97-2953FE

                                  )

ILENE LIEBERMAN,                  )

                                  )

Respondent.                       )

__________________________________)

 

 

RECOMMENDED ORDER

 

Pursuant to notice, a formal hearing was held in this case by video teleconference on January 9, 1998, at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, before Susan B. Kirkland, a duly designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES

For Petitioner:  Anthony Titone, Esquire

                 7471 West Oakland Park Boulevard

                 Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33314

 

For Respondent:  Stuart R. Michelson, Esquire

                 1111 Kane Concourse, Suite 517

                 Bay Harbor Islands, Florida  33154

 

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES


What is the amount of reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred by Ilene Lieberman in connection with the appeal in the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Case No. 95-01530, and what is the reasonable amount of attorney's fees and costs incurred by Ilene Lieberman in connection with the underlying proceedings, DOAH Case No. 93-1181EC and Commission on Ethics Case No. 92-2, for services rendered after the last day of the final hearing on June 14, 1994?

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

On June 26, 1996, the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, entered an Order granting a motion for attorney's fees filed on behalf of Ilene Lieberman in Case No. 95-01530.  On  June 26, 1996, the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, also entered an opinion which affirmed the award of attorney's fees made by the Commission on Ethics and reversed and remanded for an additional award of fees for services and costs incurred after the last date of the administrative hearing.  On July 12, 1996, the court issued a mandate to the Commission on Ethics, whereupon this matter was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for assignment to an administrative law judge.

The final hearing was scheduled for October 30, 1997.  Petitioner filed a motion for continuance, which was granted.  The final hearing was rescheduled for January 9, 1998.

At the final hearing, Respondent called Michael Moskowitz as her expert witness on the amount of the fees.  The parties stipulated that all the fees and costs for which evidence was presented were paid by the City of Lauderhill.  Respondent's Exhibits 1-68 were entered into evidence.


Respondent was granted leave to file the court reporter's invoice for the transcript of the final hearing as a late filed exhibit.  The invoice was to be filed with Respondent's proposed recommended order.  Petitioner was to file any objections to the amount of the invoice within ten days of the filing of the invoice by Respondent.

At the final hearing the parties agreed to file proposed recommended orders within ten days of the filing of the transcript.  The transcript was filed on January 26, 1998.  Respondent filed her proposed recommended order on January 29, 1998, along with the invoice for the transcript of the final hearing.  Petitioner did not file a proposed recommended order and did not file any objection to the amount of the court reporter's invoice.  The court reporter's invoice is admitted into evidence as Respondent's Exhibit 69.  Respondent's proposed recommended order has been considered by the undersigned administrative law judge in the rendition of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


1.  On June 26, 1996, the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, entered an Order granting Respondent's Motion for Attorney's Fees in Case No. 95-01530, and also entered an opinion, Kaminsky v. Lieberman, 675 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996),  awarding fees for services rendered subsequent to     June 14, 1994, in Ethics Commission Case No. 93-1181EC and remanding the case to the Ethics Commission for a determination of the amount of fees and costs to be awarded.

2.  Attorney Michael Moskowitz was retained by the Respondent, Ilene Lieberman (Lieberman) to testify at the final hearing on the reasonable amount of attorney's fees and costs incurred by Lieberman.  Without objection, Mr. Moskowitz was qualified and accepted as an expert on the subject of determining reasonable attorney's fees.

3.  Prior to rendering an opinion on the reasonable amount of attorney's fees incurred by Lieberman, Mr. Moskowitz reviewed the following documents relating to these proceedings:  several volumes of pleadings and briefs, some of Stuart Michelson's research files, Mr. Michelson's correspondence files, and seventeen statements from Mr. Michelson for legal services rendered.  Mr. Moskowitz is familiar with the case of Florida Patients Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985) and Florida Bar Rule 4-1.5.  Mr. Moskowitz also interviewed    Mr. Michelson regarding the work Mr. Michelson performed.  Based on the foregoing information, Mr. Moskowitz rendered his opinion on the reasonable hourly rate and the reasonable number of hours for the work performed and, consequently, a reasonable legal fee for the services rendered.


4.  For services rendered prior to January 8, 1998,       Mr. Michelson charged an hourly rate of $125.00 for his services and $50.00 for the services of paralegals or law clerks.  Based on Mr. Michelson's skill, experience and reputation, the hourly rate of $125 is reasonable and low for the area in which he practices, South Florida.  The rate of $50 per hour for paralegal services is a reasonable rate for the community.

5.  Mr. Michelson charged an hourly rate of $200.00 for services rendered after January 1, 1998.  This is a reasonable fee, which is below the market rate for South Florida, including the City of Lauderhill area.

6.  The reasonable number of attorney hours spent for the defense of the appeal of Petitioner, David Kaminsky (Kaminsky), to the Fourth District Court of Appeal from the Final Order of the Ethics Commission, as well as the prosecution of Lieberman's cross-appeal is 237.95.  At $125 per hour, this number of hours amounts to a reasonable fee of $29,743.75.

7.  The reasonable amount of paralegal hours in connection with the appeal and cross-appeal is 75.5.  At $50 per hour, this amounts to a reasonable fee of $3,777.50.

8.  The reasonable amount of attorney hours for the services rendered in DOAH Case No. 93-1181EC and Commission on Ethics Case No. 92-2, after the last day of the final hearing, from June 17, 1994, to May 5, 1995, is 224.30.  At $125 per hour, this amounts to a reasonable fee of $28,037.50.  The reasonable amount of paralegal hours for the same proceedings is 37.15.  At $50 per hour, this amounts to a reasonable fee of $1,857.50.


9.  It will be necessary to expend attorney time to bring these proceedings to a conclusion, including a hearing before the Commission on Ethics.  The reasonable amount of time anticipated to be spent in connection with these future proceedings is 22.5 hours at $200 per hour, totaling $4,500.00.

10.  The total amount of reasonable costs incurred up to January 9, 1998, is $7,533.38.

11.  Mr. Moskowitz expended at least 21.5 hours in connection with his work as an expert witness in this case.  His hourly rate is $250.00.

12.  The cost of the transcript of the final hearing on January 9, 1998, is $388.95.

13.  All the fees and costs for which evidence was presented were paid by the City of Lauderhill on behalf of Lieberman.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

14.  The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this proceeding.  Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.


15.  In Florida Patient Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985), the Florida Supreme Court adopted the criteria set forth in Disciplinary Rule 2-106(6) (now renumbered as 4-1.5) of the Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility to be used in determining reasonable attorney's fees.  The criteria to be considered include:  (1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the question involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal services properly; (2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer; (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar services; (4) the amount involved and the results obtained; (5) the time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances; (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client; (7) experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and (8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.

16.  The reasonable amount of attorney's fees in connection with the proceedings before the Ethics Commission subsequent to June 17, 1994, and up until the date that the notice of appeal was filed with the Fourth District Court of Appeal is $28,037.50 and the reasonable amount for paralegal services is $1,857.50.

17.  The reasonable amount of attorney's fees spent in connection with the appeal is $29,743.75, and the reasonable amount of fees for paralegal services is $3,777.50.

18.  The reasonable amount of attorney's fees spent on the proceedings after June 26, 1996, through January 9, 1998, in connection with the determination of fees owing in this proceeding is $5,172.50 for attorney time and $160.00 for paralegal time.

19.  The reasonable amount of attorney time to be expended to bring this case to its conclusion is 22.5 hours, which equates to $4,500.


20.  Based on the factors set forth in Florida Compensation Fund v. Rowe, supra, the total amount of reasonable attorney's fees, including paralegal fees, rendered by the Michelson law firm with the appeal and the proceedings before the Ethics Commission and to be rendered by the Michelson law firm in connection with these proceedings in the future is $73,376.25.  

21.  A reasonable amount of fees for Mr. Moskowitz as an expert witness in the fee determination hearing is $5,375.00, based on 21.5 hours at $250 per hour.

22.  The reasonable amount of costs incurred by Lieberman in connection with these proceedings is $7,533.38, which includes the cost of the transcript of the January 9, 1998, hearing.

 

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that a Final Order be entered awarding to the Respondent, Ilene Lieberman, $73,376.25 for reasonable attorney's fees, $7,922.33 for reasonable costs, and $5,375.00 for expert witness fees in connection with this proceeding.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of February, 1998, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

 

                            __________________________________

                            SUSAN B. KIRKLAND

                            Administrative Law Judge

                            Division of Administrative Hearings

                            The DeSoto Building

                            1230 Apalachee Parkway

                            Tallahassee, Florida  32399-3060


                            (850) 488-9675   SUNCOM 278-9675

                            Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

 

                            Filed with the Clerk of the

                            Division of Administrative Hearings

                            this 17th day of February, 1998.

 

 

COPIES FURNISHED:

 

Bonnie Williams

Executive Director

Ethics Commission

Post Office Drawer 15709

Tallahassee, Florida  32317-5709

 

Phil Claypool

General Counsel

Ethics Commission

Post Office Drawer 15709

Tallahassee, Florida  32317-5709

 

Stuart R. Michelson, Esquire

1111 Kane Concourse, Suite 517

Bay Harbor Islands, Florida  33154

Anthony J. Titone, Esquire

7471 West Oakland Park Boulevard

Suite 110

Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33119

 

 

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

 

All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order.  Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.