BEFORE THE
STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION ON ETHICS
In re WALLACE RICH, )
)
Respondent. ) Complaint No. 89-32
) Final
Order No. COE 92-12
__________________________)
FINAL ORDER AND PUBLIC
REPORT
This
matter came before the Commission on Ethics, meeting in public session on June
5, 1992, upon the mandate of the First District Court of Appeal issued in
Wallace Rich v. Florida Commission on Ethics, Docket No. 91-2619. The Court's opinion in that case reverses
those parts of the Commission's final order (Issue 15) which found that the
Respondent violated Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, by entering into a
contractual relationship with Artel Shows, a business entity subject to the
regulation of the Department of Agriculture, to inspect amusement rides at a
church carnival, and which recommended that a restitution penalty in the amount
of $100.00 be imposed against him.
Pursuant to this mandate, the Commission finds that the
Respondent, as Chief of the Bureau of Fairs and Expositions, Florida Department
of Agriculture, did not violate Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, as
alleged in this issue of the complaint.
Therefore, the Commission hereby revokes its recommendation of a
restitution penalty.
ORDERED by the State of Florida Commission on Ethics meeting in
public session on June 5, 1992.
_______________________________
Date Rendered
_______________________________
Dean Bunch
Chairman
Commission on
Ethics
THIS ORDER CONSTITUTES
FINAL AGENCY ACTION. ANY PARTY WHO IS
ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS ORDER HAS THE RIGHT TO SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER
SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES, BY FILING A NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
PURSUANT TO RULE 9.110, FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, WITH THE CLERK OF
THE COMMISSION ON ETHICS, 2107 THE CAPITOL, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-1450; AND BY FILING A COPY OF THE
NOTICE OF APPEAL ACCOMPANIED BY THE APPLICABLE FILING FEES WITH THE APPROPRIATE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL. THE NOTICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE THIS ORDER IS
RENDERED.
Copies furnished to:
Ms. Martha W. Barnett and Mr. Scott
Makar,
Attorneys for Respondent
Ms. Virlindia Doss, Commission Advocate
Mr. Norman Ostrau, Complainant