STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION ON ETHICS
In re ROBERT HILL, )
Respondent. ) Complaint No. 90-32
FINAL ORDER AND PUBLIC REPORT
This matter came before the Commission on Ethics for final action on review of the Recommended Public Report of the Hearing Officer (a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference). Neither the Respondent nor the Commission Advocate filed exceptions to the Recommended Public Report.
Having reviewed the Recommended Public Report and the evidentiary record that formed the basis for the Recommended Public Report, the Commission hereby adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended final action of the Recommended Public Report. Accordingly, the Commission finds that the Respondent, Robert Hill, as Superintendent of Schools for Liberty County, did not violate Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, as alleged in this complaint. The complaint is hereby dismissed.
ORDERED by the State of Florida Commission on Ethics meeting in public session on the 24th day of January, 1991.
Scott G. Williams
Commission on Ethics
THIS ORDER CONSTITUTES FINAL AGENCY ACTION. ANY PARTY TO THIS ORDER WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS ORDER HAS THE RIGHT TO SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES, BY FILING A NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 9.110, FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, WITH THE CLERK OF THE COMMISSION ON ETHICS, 2107 THE CAPITOL, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-1450; AND BY FILING A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL ACCOMPANIED BY THE APPLICABLE FILING FEES WITH THE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL. THE NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE THIS ORDER IS RENDERED.
Copies furnished to:
Mr. Kenneth L. Hosford, Attorney for Respondent
Mr. Charles T. "Chip" Collette, Attorney for Respondent
Mr. Craig B. Willis, Commission Advocate
Dr. Laban Bontrager, Complainant